News and Updates

Indigenous Peoples and the CBD Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework

Indigenous Peoples and the CBD Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework

BAGUIO CITY, Philippines – “As the original stewards and owners of the lands and waters on this planet, our message throughout our discussions this week is that cultural intelligence working with nature is the best way forward”. Ken Paul from the Assembly of First Nations was speaking on behalf of the International Indigenous Forum on Biological Diversity (#IIFB) during the Second Meeting of the Open-ended Working Group (OEWG) on the Post 2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, held in February this year in Rome, Italy. His message guides the indigenous participants in the different agenda being discussed under the Convention on Biological Diversity (#CBD).

As the implementation period for the current Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, including the 20 Aichi Biodiversity Targets, draws to a close, the CBD is undertaking a comprehensive and participatory process for the development of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. The process adopted by the fourteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the CBD fosters the engagement of all relevant stakeholders; thus, it is important that #indigenouspeoples are able to effectively participate in this process in order to ensure a framework that recognizes their rights and role in its implementation.

The process of the development of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework established an open-ended intersessional working group on the post-2020 global biodiversity framework that will meet three times prior to the fifteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties (originally scheduled for October 2020, but now moved to 2021 due to the global pandemic).

The OEWG already met twice on August 27-30, 2019 and February 24-29, 2020, in Nairobi, Kenya and Rome, Italy, respectively. In these meetings, IIFB has generally been pushing for several lobby points, such as for the security of indigenous peoples lands, territories and resources be reflected as part of a target, that cultural diversity be reflected as directly linked with biodiversity, as well as that a rights-based approach be adopted and incorporated in the monitoring and implementation of the framework.

During the OEWG-1, the IIFB provided inputs on the potential elements of the structure and scope of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. In the OEWG-2, the IIFB asserted how indigenous peoples rights should be reflected in the post-2020 global biodiversity framework and successfully lobbied with party delegations from Philippines, Australia, Mexico, Colombia and Norway. Because of these efforts, currently, several concepts that are supportive of indigenous peoples’ rights are included in the report of the meeting and is recommended to be considered in the preparation of the documents for the upcoming Subsidiary Body on Implementation (SBI) at its third meeting, Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA) at its twenty-fourth meeting, and OEWG-3 for the post 2020 global biodiversity framework. This enhances the chance of indigenous peoples to negotiate for better policies when the framework structure is finalized and adopted in COP 15.

Several examples are the widening of scope of benefit sharing to include biological resources and ecosystem services, recognition of indigenous food systems, recognition of customary sustainable use, integration of cultural values, utilizing ecosystem-based approaches, and protection of the right to free prior and informed consent, among others.
In the beginning of 2019 up to the present, a series of global, regional, thematic consultations, and online forums were organized by the CBD Secretariat as part of the process of developing a robust post-2020 global biodiversity framework. While

indigenous peoples were able to attend the consultations, some concerns had to be raised, such as the limited number of indigenous participants during the regional consultations and that the outcomes of the global thematic dialogue for indigenous peoples and local communities were not reflected in the zero draft of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework.

Intersessional meetings of the Ad-Hoc Open-ended Working Group on Article 8(j) and Related Provisions (WG8J) and the SBSTTA 23 were also convened in November 2019 in Montreal.

The WG8J 11 examined the potential role of traditional knowledge, customary sustainable use and the contribution of the collective actions of indigenous peoples and local communities to the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. IIFB was able to influence the recommendations adopted by the SBSTTA and WG8J including for an option for a permanent body to address indigenous peoples’ concerns in relation to biodiversity when negotiating for the form by which the WG8J will continue post-2020. This is to address how indigenous peoples’ concerns are currently being addressed in the CBD, where by an ad-hoc working group is meeting once a year to address issues only relating to traditional knowledge. The IIFB asserts that indigenous peoples are central to the achievement of the objectives of the Convention, and that their rights and issues are relevant to all aspects of the Convention.

Meanwhile, SBSTTA 23 reviewed possible elements for the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. The that IIFB contended that the evidence base shows that indigenous peoples territories show less decline in biodiversity, and as such, indigenous peoples right to land, territories and resources must be secured and reflected in the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. Throughout the meeting, IIFB and allies in the CSO had called for the full recognition of indigenous peoples lands, waters, territories and resources. This remains a contentious issue for many countries, because it is usually interpreted as challenging the sovereignty of a nation over all territories within its jurisdiction.

To date, most of the upcoming CBD meetings were postponed in light of the current coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic while some were held through a combination of live virtual sessions and online discussions. Despite this setback, indigenous peoples look forward to participation fully and effectively in this process and its implementation for the years to come.

As aptly intervened by Aslak Holmberg on behalf of the IIFB during the opening of OEWG-2, “Nature needs urgent measures. We need to act now to protect our biodiversity. There is no more time to waste. The recognition of our rights to govern our own territories and practice our knowledge contributes to community and ecosystem resilience. As the guardians and defenders of Mother Earth, we urge all governments to act on behalf of biodiversity. See us as the most valuable part of the solution, and work together with us towards a new relationship with nature - one that heals and sustains for all of our future generations.”

CBD Advocacy and Negotiations Training

CBD Advocacy and Negotiations Training

BAGUIO CITY, Philippines – A total of twelve (12) participants from Elatia and the International Indigenous Forum on Biodiversity (IIFB) attended the CBD Advocacy and Negotiations Training between November 2019 and February 2020, held alongside with Eleventh Meeting of the Ad Hoc Open-ended Working Group on Article 8(j) and Related Provisions of the Convention on Biological Diversity (WG8J 11), Twenty-third meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA 23), and the second meeting of the Open-ended Working group on the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, respectively.

The trainings were composed of four phases. Phase 1 is the web-based component where the trainees attended a webinar that provided basic information on the CBD Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. Phase 2 was dedicated for a two-day face-to-face training with four mentors to guide and advise the participants, in the persons of Jennifer Tauli-Corpuz Jing Corpuz (Nia Tero), Preston Hardison (Tulalip Tribes), Joji Carino (Forest Peoples Programme) and Gillian Dunuan (National Commission on Indigenous Peoples, Philippines). The mentors shared the history of the CBD, its objectives and methods of work of indigenous peoples engagement, process to adopt the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework and basic advocacy and negotiation skills training.

The practical or hands-on component of the training constitute Phase 3 where the training team guides the participants as they put into practice the skills they learned during the face-to-face session during the different CBD meetings. Phase 4 involves a follow-up and participation in other CBD meetings based on the participants’ performance in the first 3 phases of the training.

A follow up training was held in Rome, Italy, where five (5) trainees from the first training came back to act as peer mentors to the new participants.

The trainings are a timely introduction to the CBD process, as negotiations are taking place to come up with the Post 2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, which seeks to be a global framework to address the world’s current biodiversity crises and to put the world on track to a more ambitious way to conserve and protect biodiversity for future generations.

“The opportunity makes me think of possible activities to connect international work to national and community work”, Eunice Sinore Nkopio of the Maasai Pastoralists Integrated Development Organization (MPIDO), Kenya, said about the training. Her organization is involved in community monitoring work, such as Indigenous Navigator (IN) and Community Based Monitoring and Information System (CBMIS).

Ida Maria of the Saami Council, Finland, said that attending the training helped her become more equipped to help in the advocacy work of her organization. She is also regular attendee of the UN Permanent Form on Indigenous Issues (#UNPFII).

Alice of BC Initiative, Malaysia, who has already previously attended a CBD meeting, realized the need for a better communication strategy from Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs), to garner support in the negotiations. “Conservation

NGOS sometimes come with their own agenda. We [indigenous peoples] also need to communicate that they cannot impose their framework on our way of life”, she added.

Dilya of Center of Indigenous Peoples of the North (CSIPN), Russia and Aaron of the Tulalip Tribes, USA, both newcomers to CBD processes, were also thankful for the experience, despite the steep learning curve. “The knowledge gained at the participation in the training, I want to share in my region”, Dilya said, while Aaron was inspired, as with the others, to influence their national positions. “The representative of US is not someone we can really influence, so I have to find the right avenues.

When I go back home, I have to exercise my analytical side and writing side”, he added.

The training was organized by the ELATIA Indigenous Peoples’ Training Institute (through Tebtebba Indigenous, Tebtebba and ILEPA), with support from Nia Tero. The trainings aim to facilitate learning and skills development in the area of advocacy and negotiations for newcomers in the IIFB, so as to enable #indigenous peoples to participate more effectively in the #CBD processes.

COVID-19 and Indigenous Peoples

COVID-19 and Indigenous Peoples

As several friends, indigenous individuals and love ones get infected with COVID-19 and some have passed away I am terribly concerned. Concerned because some of these deaths could have been avoided if we have more humane and caring politicians, societies and governance systems. Concerned, because if we not learn lessons from this tragedy, we will not see an end to this. COVID-19 has shown us that atomized societies which put individualism and profit making as the pinnacle of modern civilization will further lead us to more disasters and crises. If people love and have more compassion, empathy and solidarity for and with other human beings and nature, our world will not be in this state.

The medical doctors who died due to Covid are usually the ones who took the Hippocratic Oath to heart and responded to those infected even knowing what the risks are. Patients who do not honestly disclose their travel histories have done a great disservice to these doctors.

Military and paramilitary men who still engage in extrajudicial killings during these times of crisis are despicable, to say the least. Some of them are using this situation to further engage in red-tagging and labeling human rights defenders and indigenous peoples as terrorists to justify criminalization and their murderous acts. Even worst is that they enjoy impunity as they are not brought to justice. If these men have more compassion and respect for human rights the the chances for building peaceful societies will increase.

If personal protection equipments (PPEs) are provided to health personnel and tests for Covid are done even before symptoms manifest, the exponential increase of people infected will be controlled. But no, most capitalists first think of how to earn profit during these times and thus accessibility is limited. Politicians think of how to have propaganda mileage which will increase their chances of winning the next elections so they have to label the kits and relief packages with their names. This is not to say all politicians are like this. I acknowledge that there are politicians who care for the common good and we thank them.

Even the development of vaccines and medicines becomes a competition on which corporation or country will own the intellectual property rights. During this time of Covid, solidarity should be the primordial value over anything else. Whatever happens to one person will have a reverberating impact on the rest of the world. So it is in our own enlightened self interest to help lessen the spread of the virus as it can get to any of us and our families. Even for corporations it is in their interest to do what they can as they will lose their workers and consumers. What use will their profits and wealth be amidst all these? Amazon sacking its employees who organized and joined the strike because of non provision of PPEs is emblematic of the lack of compassion and solidarity of these corporations.

Indigenous peoples are among those who are highly vulnerable to Covid because of many factors. Several of them are still internally displaced and put in cramped refugee centres. Some are found in the walled borders Trump has built between Mexico and the US. There is a lack of basic amenities, such as water, health care services and personnel in their territories which are remote and inaccessible. There 100 Navajo people who have died due to Covid in New Mexico and Arizona simply because they lack potable water resources.

When they are in urbanised areas some of them are usually in the informal economy and are domestic workers which makes them vulnerable to economic dislocation and infection. Several of them are also found in urban poor areas which are congested . Those indigenous peoples in voluntary isolation , many of which are in the Amazon, who have lesser immunity to diseases can easily disappear if an infected person comes into their communities. Bolsonaro in Brazil, has used this situation to justify entry of right-wing evangelical churches into these communities.

In the Cordillera region in the Philippines, those engaged in cash crop production cannot transport their produce to the markets because of lockdowns. These crops now lay by the wayside or given for free. The investments they put into these which usually come from debts are lost. In Indonesia those indigenous peoples raising palm oil face similar situations . After harvest, the palm nuts have to go to the market within 3 days. This is not happening as lockdowns are in place. So these palm oil planters will go bankrupt.

Another horrendous situation is the militarization of government responses. Instead of dealing with Covid as a public health issue, many governments use the military approach. This led to several indigenous persons being arrested or killed extrajudicially. We are witnessing this phenomenon in Colombia and other countries. Such abuse of emergency powers to further violate basic human rights is unacceptable and should be condemned and opposed.

Discrimination further exacerbates the situation as relief packages and health care do not reach many indigenous communities. The Mangyan in Mindoro in the Philippines sent reports that they get much less relief goods than the dominant populations. They are consistently discriminated against by some local governments and the settlers in their territories.

On the positive side many indigenous peoples are using extensively their traditional systems in dealing with crisis and disasters . Among us Kankana-ey Igorot, we declare ubaya, which is a traditional way of locking down communities when there is an epidemic or when rituals are being done. There are signposts in the entrances and exits to the village , which are usually tied stick leaves, to tell people not to enter or exit. Everybody follows this and those violating the ubaya will be punished. If the ubaya takes longer and people run out of food, the ones with more rice in their granaries are obliged to share with those who do not have. These practices of solidarity and community mobilization are common amongst indigenous peoples in other countries. The Tayrona, Arhuaco and Kogi in Santa Marta de Nevadas, also do this. Such lockdowns in other indigenous communities also do not allow corporations corporations like oil, gas and mining corporations from coming in.

I appeal to governments, corporations and actors such churches, human rights institutions to ensure that human rights is used as the framework in analysing and responding to the Covid crisis as this affects indigenous peoples and all. The situation should not be used by states to further militarize and violate human rights, such as doing arbitrary arrests and extrajudicial killings. The basic right to life should be protected. Equality and non- discrimination should be the guiding principles used when designing and implementing Covid responses. Indigenous peoples should be allowed to participate in designing, implementing and evaluating these responses. Indigenous governance systems and cultures as well as indigenous knowledge and traditional healing systems which can address the Covid crisis should be supported and reinforced. Strengthening indigenous communities and allowing them to be self- governing can help address this serious challenge in our midst. May the world prevail over this crisis and may we ensure that compassion, empathy, solidarity and respect for human rights and nature be our guideposts in creating a transformed world.

Spotlight on the 25th meeting of the Board of the Green Climate Fund

Spotlight on the 25th meeting of the Board of the Green Climate Fund

Despite the COVID-19 outbreak, the Board of the Green Climate Fund (GCF) held its scheduled Board meeting and approved six new projects, including Cuba’s first ever project. The 25th Board meeting (B25) of the GCF took place between March 10-12, 2020 in Geneva, Switzerland, increasing the Fund’s project portfolio to 130 projects with a total value of USD 21.2 billion. The six approved projects have a total funding volume of USD 618.7 million, with USD 169.7 million in GCF funding and USD 449 million in co-financing. One project triggered the GCF’s voting mechanism due to the lack of consensus and another project was strongly opposed to by civil society organizations (CSOs).

The Board meeting was chaired by the two new co-chairs, Nauman Bhatti from Pakistan, representing the developing countries’ constituency, and Sue Szabo from Canada, representing the developed countries’ constituency. The co-chairs had decided in mid-February to move the venue of B25 from the GCF’s headquarters in Songdo, South Korea to Geneva, Switzerland. This decision was made due to the evolving outbreak of the Covid-19 virus and based on discussions with the GCF secretariat and Board members during the informal Board meeting held in Monrovia, Liberia earlier in February this year. The shift of the venue also resulted in limitations on the number of advisors to Board members in the Board room and to the number of observers in the observers’ room. All social events were cancelled and no reception was held in response to the extra-ordinary circumstances.

Read more

Gender Responsive and Culturally Appropriate Methodologies in Finance Management

Gender Responsive and Culturally Appropriate Methodologies in Finance Management

BAGUIO CITY, Philippines - Twelve staff from the Finance Unit of Tebtebba including two staff from the Indigenous Peoples Rights International (IPRI) participated in a three-day training last March 7-9, 2020 at Maryknoll Ecological Sanctuary in Baguio City, Philippines.

The training aimed to enhance the knowledge and skills of the Finance Unit staff in training facilitation using gender- responsive and culturally-appropriate methodologies and approaches in delivering finance management training to indigenous peoples’ organizations and communities in the Philippines. Towards this, the Community Finance Management Training Guide for Facilitators is simulated for two days. The guide for facilitators is designed to help the staff in training officers and members of the indigenous peoples’ organizations with finance management functions to manage efficiently and effectively their financial resources.

Florence Daguitan, Programme Coordinator of the #IndigenousPeoples Biodiversity Programme of @ Tebtebba, emphasized that conducting training with indigenous learners must be conscious of and be able to adapt to their contexts and cultures. She also stressed that the principles of indigenous peoples sustainable self-determined development (IPSSDD) should not be separate to the principles of finance management.

“There is a need to simplify the finance management training guide so that it becomes easier and more practical for our indigenous communities and partners on the ground to understand,” she added.

After reviewing the facilitator’s guide, the staff simulated how to introduce the topic, the activities and inputs and how to wrap up or end the discussion. After each group simulated the modules assigned to them, a collective feedbacking followed.

“This kind of training would help us engage well with our indigenous peoples’ partners”, remarked Janice Guzman, an Ibaloi and one of the Finance Unit staff.

The Elatia Training Institute which organized the activity is established in 2018 to build the capacity of next generation of indigenous leaders and to serve as platform for knowledge sharing for them. It is presently coordinated by Maribeth Bugtong-Biano.

 

Tebtebba

1 Roman Ayson Road
Baguio City 2600
Philippines

Tel. No.: +63 74 444 7703
E-mail: tebtebba@tebtebba.org